User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171125144641

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

That is exactly what I wanted you to say.

If we conclude that the narrative of Legacy can be told without the gameplay, Legacy is a potential valid source. I say "potential" because we haven't proven its validity; we will only have disproven one of the many arguments against it.

And yet there's one thing that hasn't been considered in the past few posts: this isn't a Legacy thread! Shambala's proposal in #23 of this thread was to discuss each game separately, so we should leave Legacy be until we determine the status of the medium as a whole.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171125144641&oldid=3505003"