User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171127213427

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Amorkuz wrote:

Bwburke94 wrote: this isn't a Legacy thread!

And this is exactly what I wanted to point out. This thread is about reexamining the general rules applied to games. It would be counterproductive to turn it into yet another discussion about the validity of Legacy.

While this isn’t a Legacy thread, it is a good case study of a game that doesn’t diverge, therefore meaning that games in general can’t all be ruled out for that reason.

Re: OS25’s question, I would say that if the story isn’t changed by the differences, then it can be counted as not diverging. Minor dialog changes which still maintain the same story progression shouldn’t matter, as we don’t generally quote dialog on articles anyway.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171127213427&oldid=3505052"