User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170306000614

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:44, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Thanks for understanding I'm not here to be a pain in the derrière. I said previously that it's a win-win. If, somewhere out there, there's an valid LEGO DWU, that's a win because it's such a cool prospect. If these Daleks are from the official DWU and look the way they do just because they're under the laws of physics of the LEGO multiverse, that's also a win because that means that awesome movie is valid in our eyes. I've nothing against any decision made here today or further down the line.

I'd just prefer something that nails it. You'll know what it is when you see it. If you spot something and think "this'll shut TFD's stupid face up" then you know you've found the quote. Until that day, whether it be in a week, a month or a year, I'm not happy in watching this discussion close. Ultimately, it's not my decision but I care too much about this Wiki to see something scrape through haha. I like stories to stride on through. Or as they say in German- "stolzieren", it's a great verb meaning to stroll (with pride).

I think we can all agree that the active commenters here aren't saying "LEGOs are stupid". We weed out those people along the way haha. Anyway, I'm excited to see how this debate unfolds from here out.