Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-24894325-20170224143935

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

To answer OttselSpy25, one does not have to prove they are meant to be characters from a TV show to invalidate the story. That is certainly a speculation. In order to consider this a valid story, one needs to prove, as TheChampionOfTime said that they are intended to be the same Daleks, who were transported to the movie setting directly from the DWU. I can see two arguments in favour of this: they look like Daleks and they say "Exterminate". I still hope somebody would explain how real Daleks got into the movie.

What plays against them being the real Daleks is that they are never called Daleks (across the third of the movie). The only thing they are called is "British robots". And we certainly cannot use "LEGO Dimensions" as a precedent based on the reasoning "it-would-have-been-valid-were-it-not-a-game".

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.