Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-24894325-20170224230258

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

We do not pretend it does not exist. We absolutely should cover both on the wiki, in cultural references. We should not, on the other hand, pretend it is valid when it was, in fact, deemed invalid. That is the point of view I vehemently oppose: arguing on the counterfactual basis that, were it not a game, it would have been valid so let us treat it as quasi-valid. It was deemed invalid - game over by T:BOUND. It cannot be used for in-universe explanations. Therefore, one needs to search for such evidence in the movie itself.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.