User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-25117610-20170225002143

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:46, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Yeah, as someone who's also leaning to accept The LEGO Batman Movie a valid source here, I also think this thread will be very important for future LEGO releases with DW characters.

Now, I'll state something that's indeed very obvious, but I feel like it should be here just for the sake's of stating it: even if we do deem this a VS, we definetelly should not add any other sequels (like a possible "The Lego Batman Movie 2") or spin-offs that may come from this movie if the said movie does not contain DWU elements.

So, what I mean is a Death's Head-like situation: Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling!, Time Bomb! and Party Animals are valid here, but anything else with him isn't, because there's no other DW elements there.

Similarlly, if a "Lego Batman 2" comes out, but features nothing from DWU, it doesn't get a page here. And vice-versa: if a spin-off from this movie comes out, and features a DW element, it probably should get a page as well.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-25117610-20170225002143&oldid=3505439"