User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170225203828

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:48, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Amorkuz wrote: Here, we are talking about the portal to the DWU and the place of DWU in LEGO universe. It is not a standard LEGO object to treat it by LEGO rules. And these stories have been considered for validity and deemed invalid. That for me excludes the possibility of using their narratives.

We wouldn't really be referencing their narratives. We would never say "Oh by the way, the Doctor met a Batman once." However, the importance of how the universes are set up in the franchise is important enough from an out-of-universe setting that we can use it to justify authorial intent. Furthermore I don't see a problem with us saying something as small as the fact that the Daleks aren't from the Batman universe. That's just about as far as we'd stretch it by this point.

How Doctor Who is treated in Lego Dimensions is going to be how it's most likely going to be treated for every appearance in the franchise. So understanding the game is important to trying to set up a basic precedent.

Saying something as simple as that there is a multi-verse in the LEGO universe isn't really too far against policy.