User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170224114925

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:50, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'm going to agree that it would be weird if this was included. But that isn't a reason for a story to be declared invalid.

The main question is. Is a licensed cameo, a DWU story?

Also, this could be an alternate universe where everything is LEGO in the DWU, how it fits is not our problem.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170224114925&oldid=3505681"