User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-1272640-20180319080336

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170306172600
Revision as of 14:51, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I hate to necropost, but I agree that there's really no reason to consider Rescue, Storm in a Tikka, or Fixing a Hole invalid based on the fact that they refer to invalid stories. That's dangerously close to moving from an invalid/valid distinction to a non-canon/canon distinction. And I don't like such a concept at all.

I've read Storm in a Tikka. It's really its own thing, as supported by OttelSpy25's quotes provided.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-1272640-20180319080336&oldid=3505725"