Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Amy's Choice

Theory page


You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which Amy's Choice doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 


  • Copying from the Story Notes, TARDIS' "Build date: 1963." This implies that a) TARDISes are build (not grown for a very-very long time, like mentioned earliear) b) when the First Doctor stole it, it was just finished being "built", without leaving any sort of leevay for travelling with Susan beforehand and c) Gallifrey has the same year measuring system as the Earth does.
  • This was a dream, granted, but seriously, a star that radiates cold? Since the Dream Lord is the Doctor, surely he would not dream of such a blant violation against the laws of physics?
The Doctor told that he doesn't know anything, the universe is big, plus that the laws of physics in the parallel universes are different, so the Doctor could be in a parallel one?
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.