User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-95.147.32.223-20170306201902

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170306172600
Revision as of 15:09, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

You have a good point but my question is do these stories make sense without the invalid story although you can say the events happened but not as dipicted in the invalid story one thing about braking the fourth wall if a fix with sontarans is invalid because it broke it then why is the feast of steven or the comic the fourth wall valid as both brak it quite casually

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-95.147.32.223-20170306201902&oldid=3506680"