User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606131016

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45314928-20200606025128
Revision as of 15:16, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

we don't agree completely, we agree that a discarded novelisation is an unproduced story however he also believes;

  • that an extract from this unproduced story (presented as a discarded piece of work) is somehow a valid story in its own right.
  • that Emily Cook wasn't talking about this discarded story when she dismissed it as being part of lockdown... but a discarded television pitch from 2015...
Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606131016&oldid=3507132"