User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606140333

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45314928-20200606025128
Revision as of 15:16, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Rule One: Only stories count

this is an extract, and not a story in itself. it misses a start, beginning and end. it is completely unlike Revenge of the Nestene and Dalek alternative script extract which were made clear to be specially written for the lockdown event (Emily Cook's involvement prove that - be it in producing like Nestene, or organising like Dalek).

Rule Two: A story that isn't commercially licensed by all of the relevant copyright holders doesn't count

theres no license evidence whatsoever. apparently Harness using the hashtag for a tweet-along (which had ended over twelve hours earlier) is evidence that it was licensed? it is not.

Rule Three: A story must be officially released to be valid

this wasn't "officially released". it was shared by Harness with no promotion anywhere other than his own twitter account. his comments, about sharing it because of fan interest, make it clear that this wasnt planned and therefore not an official release.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606140333&oldid=3507145"