User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45314928-20200707131140
Revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Understandable, but I believe an admin said it was easier to rule out charity publications altogether than go through them on a case by case basis, determining the legality of the stories. If you could provide evidence that Lance Parkin (and Paul Magrs in the case of the Iris Wildthyme story) and Kate Orman still have the rights to these stories, then technically they can be accepted as a valid source.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559&oldid=3507343"