User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723190605

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45692830-20200510214412
Revision as of 15:21, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Well, no, we can't, on account of it's locked due to a technical glitch, and no admin has told us what to do about that yet.

It is clear that only official sources should be referenced on this site. I never disputed that. But that is precisely why you shouldn't take issue with the statement that fanfic "has something to do" with Doctor Who.

Our Wiki does not have a mission statement of covering everything that "has something to do" with Doctor Who — thankfully. It is perfectly normal for things that "have something to do" with Doctor Who to not be covered on this Wiki. I am not at all saying that "Fanfilm X has something to do with Doctor Who" translates to "Fanfilm X is something we should cover". That is in fact my point.

As for "umbrella term", I too interpreted the use of the phrase "umbrella term" as Emily Cook embracing the Ellie Collins classic watchalongs (for example) as being a facet of Doctor Who: Lockdown!, albeit an unlicensed one. And let me remind you, Collins did produce her own webcasts for her Classic tweetalongs, which are fanfilms and consequently are not covered (the only one we ever had a page on, namely The Castellan…, is pending deletion as we speak).

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723190605&oldid=3507444"