User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-45692830-20200723151601

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45692830-20200723133026
Revision as of 15:22, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I guess we could quibble over whether it's the license holder's intent to have it be in the DWU vs Farnell's intent. Again, I felt that I'm not really the best person to make this thread as I don't see that much of an issue with it being valid (as I take a rather broad view on validity generally), but that it at least deserved discussion. Similar to The Zygon Isolation maybe being "a little too close to home for comfort" we might not like the idea of an author specifically trying to "game the system" to get a work to be "valid" when it normally wouldn't be. Again, I see no issue, but I dunno what other users feel.