Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-1350697-20170226142052

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120
Revision as of 15:23, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think Rescue would logically go along with it, yeah.

And I don't think the article about DiT itself can be framed as being about a dream the McCoy incarnation had -- that's not what DiT is, or how it presents itself, but if a novel later retcons it as events that only occurred in a dream had by the McCoy incarnation, that's certainly the sensible way to present the information on, say, the article about the Seventh Doctor.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.