User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1432718-20150729034036

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5545417-20150725190725
Revision as of 15:26, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

We need to use the "four little rules" located at Tardis:Valid sources to determine any story's validity.

  1. Are these stories? I'm not at all familiar with these but it sounds like there's no argument here (please correct me if I'm wrong).
  2. Is it commercially licensed by all relevant copyright holders? That would have to be answered by someone familiar with the stories.
  3. Have these stories been officially released? Once again, it seems like there's no argument here.
  4. Is it intended to be set outside the DWU? This seems like the question that will generate the most debate on this issue.

I suggest anyone who hasn't read the guidelines for valid sources please do so. There is a longer description of each point than what I posted here.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1432718-20150729034036&oldid=3507712"