User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150902213345

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5545417-20150725190725
Revision as of 15:27, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hope I'm not being obnoxious here by stating one last piece of evidence (which was briefly mentioned above but never really acknowledged as important as a group). On the question of "are the back-up comics valid and do they connect to the story, Four Doctors tries really hard to make us think so.

Back-up strip, issue 1
Main comic, issue 2

Throughout the entire series, 11 constantly references "the comics" he picked up from the stand, even when the comic is totally inconsistent on weather we has the bundle or not. Even when they land out of the Continuity trap he still mentions that he has them still, even when he clearly doesn't (unless the huge pox is in the liner of his coat). Here you can note the news stand being exactly the same sans artistic style and 11 noting in really forced dialogue that the stand is where he bought the comics. Also note the bundle held by both Doctors.