User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-1506468-20190916171044

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745
Revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Closing the thread as the general consensus is that the anthology should be deemed (for the most part) valid. Stories in the anthology with clear authorial intent to be set in the DWU are deemed valid, whereas those stories highlighted in this thread which aren't meant to be taken seriously will continue to be deemed as invalid.