User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20171213234248

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745
Revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NateBumber wrote: Does anyone disagree with this assessment? Even if so, I think the next step is running through and sorting each poem into the five categories.

Indeed, I've made an initial categorisation into the five categories which can be seen on my sandbox. I was actually really surprised to find that the majority of stories feature reference to a person telling the story. In fact poems like Harriet Jones, PM (which I would have placed in the 'clear narrative' section) featured a reference that it was Harriet telling the story which I had forgotten about.

The categories which will have to be discussed the most are the narrative ones. I could only find two poems that I could question the narrative of (as I found most had enough content to drive a plot) but of course all narrative poems should be discussed (if only briefly). Additionally if anyone feels a story is wrongly placed please say so as the current list is essentially a first draft.