User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-24894325-20160914225318

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807
Revision as of 18:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-24894325-20160914225318 It seems that AeD's classification is very close to mine. And the new info/nothing new distinction seems to be a comic-book analogue of new footage/archival footage criterion used for TV stories. On the one hand, policies of other wikis are not directly applicable. On the other hand, it is instructive to know how a society devoted solely to comic books treats such things.

I have one proposal though. Let us exclude Petals from this discussion. I fear that it is too open to interpretation: is it mere memory? are they helping? are they watching? is he talking to them? are they talking to him? I suspect that context matters for that story and that it is one of the cases that would need to be discussed separately no matter the general rules.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-24894325-20160914225318&oldid=3513488"