User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-10983683-20140811212412/@comment-26845762-20160804134121

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-10983683-20140811212412
Revision as of 19:59, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in Attack of the Grask. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid.

As for the Cure of Fatal Death, a Master definitely appears. Does THE Master appear in The Infinity Doctors or Sympathy for the Devil? No, but a Master sure does. All of these Masters are different shades of the same person, the same character.

My views are exactly the same on this matter as RingiRoadAgain's.

  1. Follow the order given in Tardis:Prefixes
  2. Stories in anthologies should be listed separately
  3. Oh yes, listing NONVALIDs would be the best thing since sliced bread!
  4. I agree with everyone that we should just keep the prefix headings we have now

My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances?