User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-1827503-20160108012640

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618
Revision as of 20:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bold Clone wrote: Actually, I think that brings up a good point, Bwburke. How do official sources fit in to this system of story reckoning? Would we simply disregard the BBC, DWM, Radio Times, and the like (maybe keeping a note explaining our method)?

As much as I hate relying on DWM for numbering, it might help us in cases like Utopia or FTR/HS/HB. Keep in mind that we'd be relying on whether the sources count them as one story, not on what the sources number the stories as.

With that in mind, our actual policy shouldn't directly depend on the DWM or Radio Times numbering.