User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-26469787-20151029092958

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618
Revision as of 20:29, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

OttselSpy25 wrote: Now three of qualifiers is a lot more sane of a concept, for it does (basically) sort out any troubles that we have with "is it tho" story sets. To check it tho, have there been any two or more parters where different parts were written by different people?

In the BBC Wales series? No. The only argument that could be made here are the stories of Series 9, but we already seem to have a consensus amongst articles that the two "linked pairs" of the series are separate stories.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-26469787-20151029092958&oldid=3520178"