///When a novelization expands, but does not contradict

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-60605-20141206212039 As I brought up on Bruce's talk page, I don't see why the surname/given name of a character, when given in the novelized adaptation, shouldn't be included in the article's body and chosen as title. Of course, I'm well aware that novelizations often have elements that contradict what is seen on screen, and we're encouraged to dismiss them as apocryphal. However, the key word here is "contradict." When a piece of information is exclusive to a book but doesn't contradict what's on screen, I don't see why it shouldn't be included. After all, it is a novelization's work to expand on the filmed material.