///Do the Monster Files fail our four valid source rules?
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20140219051032 Following on from the In-universe websites fails the four valid source rules? and inspired by Tybort's responses on the Talk:Abzorbalovian page, do the Monster Files fail our four little rules?
None of the Monster Files appear to present information narratively. They would seem to fall into the same category as the biographical or "historical information" that is in annuals. As T:VS states "Fictional information presented non-narratively", making it fall afoul of number 1 of the four rules in that it's not a story.
