User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1506468-20130816192308/@comment-26975268-20130816203426

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1506468-20130816192308
Revision as of 21:09, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Naa, I don't think this falls under T:SPOIL. You see, we treat all media as equally valid, so it's not like the TV show gets priority here. Part from of Sky Jacks is a story which has already been officially released.

Do we consider the so-called "Hurt revelation" in Name a spoiler? Of course not — that development was in-story, a plot development. Likewise, we wouldn't have censored out every "Bad Wolf" reference in 2005 until The Parting of the Ways simply because it references a (then-)future plot development, either.

Just in case I won't name what you think is a spoiler, but what's said in that comic — without reading into it too much and allowing speculation to get in the way — is now an in-universe fact.

The question isn't whether or not it should be censors, but really how far we can speculate. I mean, it's an obvious reference but can we make the link?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-1506468-20130816192308/@comment-26975268-20130816203426&oldid=3522226"