User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-3119405-20200319150428

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744
Revision as of 21:18, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

SOTO wrote:

No need to beat down what's put out when the intent is clear.

Just trying to be helpful. That inconsistency could easily be overlooked if we all said, "Yes, let's do that."

SOTO wrote:

(Personally, I stand by the division between 11 and 12, rather than 8 and War. It will fill out, in time, and would be sure not to get unwieldy, requiring no future judgment calls on where to cut it next.)

I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, we have the demarcation of a "cycle of regeneration" (something which may no longer apply to the Doctor). On the other, we have two rows that are of nearly equaly visual lengths.

If we stick with not splitting between 11 & 12, then we should work to maintain the visual balance as the Doctor regenerates and we update the template accordingly. If regeneration cycles do end up being applicable to the Doctor, then I'm more inclined to return to the split between 11 & 12.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-3119405-20200319150428&oldid=3522728"