User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-72.194.244.165-20200422201013

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744
Revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I mean, since Doctor Who has no canon (aside from The Adventure Games and Infinity :>), by definition everything is extra-canon. The Star Wars canon system was created by Lucas Licensing. The BBC has done no such thing for Doctor Who, so any attempt to do so would not be correct, as canon is about authority. "Validity" simply refers to what sources are allowed to be used in the body of an article from an in universe perspective, so it would be wholly meaningless to adopt a stratified approach to validity.