User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-753926-20130402213038

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336
Revision as of 21:51, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

ComicBookGoddess wrote: There are dead bodies when everything is over. Even if they'd been different people, there are separate dead bodies to account for. So, I still say 3 articles.

In any case, you're both continuing to argue in circles ad infinitum.

Here's how the comments have come down so far:

  • SOTO - 1 article
  • Witoki - 3 articles
  • MrSiriusBlack - defer the question
  • Mewiet - 3 articles
  • Tangerineduel - ? 1 article
  • Imamadmad - 3 articles, will compromise to 1
  • Czechout - 1 article
  • Shambala108 - 1 article
  • Trebligonica - 1 article
  • CultofSkaro - 1 article
  • TardisTraveler - 1 article
  • Ottselspy25 - 3 articles
  • 42Dirou - 3 articles (broccoli!)
  • Geek Mythology - 3 articles ?
  • Oh, yeah, me, - 3 articles

So, I count: 7 for one article 7 for three articles

Ouch. Unless I miscounted. Anybody else want to weigh in or change their vote?

For what it's worth, I've been through some of the arguments, and changed my mind, making it 8/6 in favour of one article.

Does that settle it?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-753926-20130402213038&oldid=3524707"