User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160508193233/@comment-24894325-20160520090532

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160508193233
Revision as of 22:28, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

That is exactly my point: it belongs to both ranges. It has Doctor Who on the cover (in the standard Doctor Who-range style) and in the title of the webpage [1] because it belongs to the Special Releases range. And it has UNIT on the cover (in one of the UNIT-range styles used before, which is now used for the New Series) and in the title of the BF webpage because it belongs to the UNIT range. The other releases from the UNIT range do not have Doctor Who exactly because they are not from the Special Releases range.

This is exactly the reason I believe that the story name is simply Dominion, and the range names should not be included in it.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160508193233/@comment-24894325-20160520090532&oldid=3526800"