User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-26845762-20160911035846

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807
Revision as of 22:30, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Now Amorkuz, I agree with you that all four of the above stories should not be considered Multi-Doctor stories. At the same time, I think that they should all be classified as appearances.

For TV, archive footage has to be "re-contextualised to be more than a simple memory of the past" to be considered an appearance. You're proposing we treat new artwork the same as archive footage. Visually, these are more than simple memories of the past. These are new takes on the past.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-26845762-20160911035846&oldid=3526903"