User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20161008100044/@comment-25117610-20181216010645

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20161008100044
Revision as of 22:30, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

As highlighted on both Amorkuz's original post and this post of mine (to see the full argument, please scroll up to that reply), there are consequences on merging all incarnations of the eleven into one: mainly, categorisation and infoboxes.

OncomingStorm12th wrote: And, in the same vein of Tardis:Even good categories can be removed, (though obviously less problematic here) I'll bring one argument used by User:TheChampionOfTime on the Eleven's talk page: the Eleven was not a Member of the High Council. The One was.

Also, as I previously said:

OncomingStorm12th wrote: So it makes absolutely no sense to me having information which happened to the Eight on a page called the Eleven, because they are separate incarnations. We would never describe events from An Unearthly Child on the War Doctor page, because those events happened during another incarnation.

Now, I'm not familiar with the source material of I.M. Foreman, but if it is the same case of the Eleven, (only one incarnation goes by this name, but we don't have a name for the Time Lord in general) I'd argue that we should split that page as well, and then put information in a page like Time Lord (Interference). But this would be topic for another thread, anyway.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20161008100044/@comment-25117610-20181216010645&oldid=3526920"