User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20150105184924/@comment-188432-20150107132100

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20150105184924
Revision as of 22:34, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

BananaClownMan wrote: Counter-theory: Since the books came out after the Magazine, it could have been easier to say they happened first due to knowing that the Doctor would travel with Izzy at some point, hence why The Eight Doctor happens immediately after San Francisco.

Ahh but they didn't, did they? They came out contemporaneously. It's literally a case of the one production team intentionally ignoring — indeed disrespecting, in the true meaning of that word — the work of the other. That's why it's significant the Master is still in the TARDIS as of The Gallifrey Chronicles. By that point, The Glorious Dead was around five years old. So BBC Books deliberately ignored DWM, and DWM couldn't have known in 2000 what BBC Books were going to do in 2005. That's why I say it's effectively impossible to rectify the two.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20150105184924/@comment-188432-20150107132100&oldid=3527179"