User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20150817124526/@comment-4139960-20150818004534

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20150817124526
Revision as of 22:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Pretty much agree with what Shambala108 said about the segment (i.e. lapels) spanning multiple episodes. If this is referring to my recent edits on Creation of the Daleks and Thousand Year War regarding The Daleks, however, my rationale is that these are small snippets of scenes several episodes apart from one another referring to distinct elements of the subjects (i.e. the Thals' account vs what the Daleks said).

If it can be argued that (TV: The Daleks) is a more suitable way of citing the episode on those two pages than, say, (TV: "The Survivors") and (TV: "The Expedition") at two different points on a paragraph, then I probably won't resist too much. I consider those to be borderline myself.

Another thing, in the case of Ian Chesterton, only the first episode covers Ian's curiosity of Susan and finding the police box mentioned in the page's At Coal Hill School section, hence the (TV: "An Unearthly Child"), while the rest of what Ian does mentioned in the Travels with the Doctor section involves information from all four episodes, including the first one, so it has (TV: An Unearthly Child) in italics. Hope that rationale makes sense.