User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20180114204444/@comment-25041817-20180723222217

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20180114204444
Revision as of 22:36, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think we're getting a tad off topic hear. I just wanted to talk about the effectiveness of a name template for Dreyfus.

But, if this is how the conversation has evolved to, this might be interesting: I personally don't use "incarnations" for the Master, unless when talking about one that is shown to be between regenerations. I prefer to use the term "rendition", since the whole "is body theft a regeneration" thing makes it hard to know what counts and what doesn't. So, put could call Pratt and Ainley renditions of the Master rather than incarnations of the Master to simplify matters.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20180114204444/@comment-25041817-20180723222217&oldid=3527269"