User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-1827503-20161221224957

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500
Revision as of 22:37, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

OncomingStorm12th wrote: Yeah, with that I must agree: boxset names can give away plot details as much as story names (some might give plot details, while ohters don't), so we should probabbly let them off the thread anyway.

"UNIT: Extinction" won't lead anyone to think about Autons, but SOTO's example is a good one where the title can lead to details.

Spoilers don't matter, because we can't discuss it until it's released. It simply makes no sense to use "spoilers" as an attempt to regulate article titles.