User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-5918438-20170304193123

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243
Revision as of 22:46, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Just to be clear, for something to be valid, it must be a story, a narrative. DWM illustrations for audio stories can certainly argued to be part of that story, and a visual representation of it, but promotional art in general is..wait for it..not a story. And only stories count.

Legacy artwork which is featured in DWM is no more valid than images on merchandise packaging or playing cards. It can go in a BTS section, if that's important to you, but by no stretch, really, can such illustrations pass T:VALID. We're not w:c:starwars.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-5918438-20170304193123&oldid=3527893"