User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-29078-20150209172154/@comment-188432-20150326024431

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-29078-20150209172154
Revision as of 23:05, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'm for it. And, as Tangerineduel has noted, we should also have one for Iris. And if there were a snowball effect and you did one for all the companions, I personally wouldn't have a problem. I think the old categorical guideline applies: as long as your category has (the potential for) three members, then it can be created. Now, I'm not saying that every 3-member notion should be put into a category, but as we've no objection to the "planets visited by the Doctor" categories — and because there's no graceful way to collect this data through an SMW template — I don't have a problem with "planets visited by <whoever>" for any long-serving recurring character, really.