Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-3030984-20180711102148/@comment-188432-20180712171047

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-3030984-20180711102148
Revision as of 23:06, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Yah, I didn't see the level of detail you're describing as the goal, nor the current state of — for example — List of BBC Blu-ray releases as something that should be continued. And of course DPL isn't quite up to that challenge.

I guess I was just stressing in my own mind the info most people would probably be wanting: what exactly is UHD and whether or not there was at least one UHD version of a title. Likewise, we might consider revamping the List of BBC Blu-ray releases along a similar lines.

That way, a page at, say, UHD Blu-ray (or something similar) would tell you which items have ever been released in UHD, and then you'd click on the title name, which would be a link to the Blu-ray section on a story page — and that would be where the greater detail lived. If we refactored like this, we'd effectively give readers three avenues to the information: the page about the format, the category about the format, and the story/season/boxset page itself. But we'd only have to actively edit the story/season/boxset page to make sure readers had easy access to the greater detail.

Of course, none of that's to say I'm right. But luckily you've raised this discussion so early in the UHD life cycle that we have time to consider multiple approaches and come up with a more consistent approach to all release formats.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.