User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-1293767-20151024191354

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837
Revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

SOTO wrote: To OS: would Category:Stories featuring multiple incarnations of the Doctor, the broadest definition of multi-Doctor stories which would include regeneration stories where a new Doctor is revealed, really be that un-useful, if a category must exist at all?

Better yet, we keep it out of the category system, and simply have a page with a list of multi-Doctor stories, divided into sections like "regeneration", "Doctors interact", etc. I might (might) even be for a navbox to go at the bottoms of story pages if it was all divided clearly, with each section having its own clear definition. In this, no attempts would be made to include or exclude certain stories or classes of stories from the concept of multi-Doctor; any story with multiple incarnations of the Doctor appearing would go under multi-Doctor, in its respective section regarding the way in which multiple Doctors appear, interact, etc.

These are the most palatable solutions I've seen so far.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-1293767-20151024191354&oldid=3529338"