User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-30325516-20191107223015

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030
Revision as of 23:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think if we can identify clear evidence that Tipple is a distinct incarnation/body/Master in his own write and that wasn’t just a body double for a pre-existing Master then he should certainly have a section of his own, and it’d be wrong not to. However as far as I’m aware so far, the only clear evidence we have of him being a distinct Master is from behind the scenes content, which we can’t use as a source.

There’s certainly nothing preventing him from existing, but there’s also not a lot to suggest that he does. Again from an in-Universe perspective as I myself personally consider Tipple to be Beevers in a stolen body.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-30325516-20191107223015&oldid=3529560"