User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-43908-20150828040655

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943
Revision as of 23:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

They are different iterations of Romana, even if both are intended to be the third. We wouldn't mix the Richard E. Grant Doctor and the Eccleston Doctor into one just because both were intended to be the Ninth by their respective creators, even if one did subsume the other in the currently-produced line of Doctor Who. Mixing both Romanas into one article is really not the way to go.

If we do classify Landau as III, I believe the right move is still to move the Brooks incarnation to Romana (Shadows of Avalon) and keep the pages separate in the name of peace and sanity. The merged "in one account" / "in another account" stuff only really works if it's the same single character we're talking about, and this wiki has always treated different incarnations of Romana as their own character. These two are quite definitely not the same Romana incarnation, before or behind the scenes.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-43908-20150828040655&oldid=3530464"