User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944/@comment-45692830-20200525194814

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944
Revision as of 23:42, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Let's be clear. If I say, "Journey's End is not sufficient to grant multi story status" and then provide reasoning, you then saying "oh but I think it is" is not a response. It's ignoring the argument. Give reasoning that successfully rebuts the reasoning presented to you.

Similarly, The Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith (TV story) is the Doctor being a companion in a Sarah Jane Smith story. :> Or, alternatively, "multi story" does not specify whether it's any tv show or the main one. So bringing up a spinoff is not obvious cause to move her across categories.

Which is really my main point, that this entire thing is a mess and there's no clear reason to change anything.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944/@comment-45692830-20200525194814&oldid=3530929"