Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-27323707-20200618224549

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418
Revision as of 23:58, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Seriously, you cannot really be that stubborn.

Robert Shearman stated that he thought of the idea for Dalek alternative script extract "last week" so unless he had a time machine that is complete confirmation that it was never truly a discarded story.

In all honesty I think that your argument, as User:DiSoRiEnTeD1 said, was a strawman one. You were trying to make his attempt to merge How The Monk Got His Habit (short story) into How The Monk Got His Habit (novelisation) look bad by suggesting the alternative script would have to be merged with Dalek (TV story). This has never been on the table, that is not the criteria that has been laid out.

Time and time again How The Monk Got His Habit sticks out like a sore thumb as the odd one out of all supposed Doctor Who: Lockdown! releases.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.