User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45314928-20200517215119

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418
Revision as of 00:00, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Najawin wrote: Well, that would be unsuccessful because it was season 12, not because it was organized by BBCA (a different corporate entity than the BBC).

Regardless, the point stands that the distinction you're advancing here, between "Lockdown" releases and "BBC releases riding the coattails of Lockdown" is untenable. As is pointed out to you in Talk:How The Monk Got His Habit (short story), the shadow trilogy is split across the lockdown youtube channel and the BBC website, and Farewell, Sarah Jane (webcast) explicitly says "Doctor Who: LOCKDOWN" on the youtube video with its soundtrack on the Lockdown channel, while the Doctor Who channel has the actual webcast.

the shadow "trilogy" is not "split up" across these three releases. the mention in the shadow passes is so tiny, it does not affect anything in the story and only hints at the two episodes paul cornell will later write.

and farewell, sarah jane was organised by emily cook... hence why it is tagged with lockdown? you will see that no release not worked on by emily was tagged with the lockdown brand name. thats because they are only associated releases.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45314928-20200517215119&oldid=3531976"