Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45314928-20200521232900

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418
Revision as of 00:03, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scrooge MacDuck wrote: we have significant evidence that Harness intended for it to be part of Lockdown!, as shown by the use of the hashtag.

the hashtags are the most meaningless thing. as ive said before, theyre used on everything and anything - fan videos, the lot. so we cannot use them to determine what is part of the event.

the tweetalong ended just prior to this comment by harness [[1]] however he continued of his own accord and much later posted the discarded Monk script. this was not part of the tweetalong, regardless of hashtags. if you are suggesting it is, then when does a guest's control over the event finish in your eyes? could a random guest representative from ages back post a story today, that is nothing to do with the event and with no indication of licensing, but still have it seen as valid by this site as they used a public hash?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.