User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-78763-20160112043719/@comment-28349479-20200323154916

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-78763-20160112043719
Revision as of 00:13, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scrooge MacDuck wrote: Plus, there is the issue of clarity for readers. People will be looking for the Cracks in Time, because that is what they're always called; they won't go looking on the page for the phenomenon of Total Event Collapse, and certainly not on that of the wider concept of Time Field.

I think this is the most important concern. Currently, Time field is dedicated to covering the phenomenon known to most of the not we as "cracks in time". This does not work because multiple Doctor Who stories have featured a "time field" completely separate from the cracks in time, and we need a page that covers the generic idea of time fields. For the reasons Scrooge gave above, it doesn't make sense to move the information about the cracks in time to Total Event Collapse, and “Time field (The Time of the Doctor)” wouldn't make much sense.