The Panopticon/What makes an "Artefact of Rassilon"?

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive
Revision as of 00:18, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I was recently trying to edit Artefacts of Rassilon into a proper article instead of a list-based article.

We have both the Artefacts of Rassilon page and the Category:Artefacts of Rassilon.

Surely to be in either the category or on the article they should actually be named an "artefact of Rassilon" or least have the Seal of Rassilon and said to be "one of the artefacts"?

But looking at some articles like Rassilon's gauntlet it seems to be in that category because Rassilon used it / created it.

Even more vague in the assignation of the category is White-Point Star which is only linked to Rassilon by way of him using a specific one.

So, I propose that to be an "Artefact of Rassilon" it actually needs to be named as such.